back to back issues > back
issues 2006

Newsletter
issue 53 May 2006
|
Hi there everybody! If only because it has been many
months since I was last able to do so, I am going to talk with you in this, my section of this newsletter, in
my ordinary everyday voice and pass on to you some plain and simple
news; and I must start by saying that this is a relief!
Some time ago, mainly because a lack
of real 'news' (we did tai chi last week, we did tai chi this week,
we plan to do tai chi next week etc.) we changed the style of this
monthly publication and have since used it to preview or promote
new article's that went on to published on either the taichido.com
or wheelswithinwheels.net websites, and since then around about
a dozen or so new pieces have been put online ... one place or another.
There have been a many article in half as many months because Mark
has written as many as me. Mark continues in that vein this month
- but, because of circumstance that I hope to explain as I go along,
I won't.
However, rest assured, this does not
mean that you will not indirectly get a new article from me this
month. You will get one ... but I didn't write it - Ray did! "Who's
Ray?" I hear you say. Long term subscribers/readers will know
that Ray was the person who taught Mark and I Tai Chi Tai Chi..
Way back in 1975 my tai chi teacher (Ray Wood, 8th Dan
Hanshi) registered his martial art instruction system as "KYUTAICHIDO"
(KYU-TAICHI-DO). That name then gradually fell into disuse until 1998 - to be then revived
in portion only as the domain name/website "TAICHIDO".com.
My rambling story continues:
When we set up the taichido website we drew considerably upon
text provided by Ray. He had written a 200+ A4 page book called
simply "Tai Chi Chuan". This document had hitherto been
published only as home DTP and mainly given away to friends. The
majority of the first pieces published at taichido.com were taken
from that DTP book.
Most of Ray's articles @taichido.com
have since been superseded with rewrites on the same or similar
themes - by Mark or me - and now the traces of Ray @taichido.com
are faint. In most instances all that remains of the originals
is the title or subject matter. This work became necessary because
Ray's personal circumstances rendered him as out of contact with
us for several years and thus, if it were ever required (and several
times it was!) that Mark or I personally verify or check sources
we were, throughout that period, unfortunatly unable to do so.
So we learnt to stand alone.
I have myself been teaching tai chi
since 1996. I met Mark in 1997 just as Ray began to fade from
view a little - and by about 1999 he was 'off the screen' completely.
Several rivers of water have gone under this bridge that I metaphorically
stand on now and many people have come and gone through the doors
of the dojo (one dojo, two locations) that I have run since day
one - and I am greatly honored to be able to say that since day
one a small group has continued to meet with me here every Thursday
night on a weekly basis. Throughout the years of Rays moratorium
I daubed this group "the core group".
The Kyu Group
The how and why Ray went away (though by the way it must be said
that I do now believe one reasons was to teach me how to stand
alone!) and the how or why of how he came back are now inconsequential.
Fact is, Ray and I again in close contact and for the last three
months he has come here once a month to my home-dojo to present
Master Classes in Sticking Hands to the core group that I have
now renamed "The Kyu Group".
Aside from this I have been further
personally privileged by Ray's provision of many new articles
and analyses on a diverse range of martial art or "Budo"
subjects. However, as the subject matter of these articles is
neither tai chi or sticking hands I felt it more fitting that
I should publish them all as a mini site "within" wheelswithinwheels.net
- the sister site of taichidocom.
Taichido.com is all about Tai Chi. The ancient Chinese art. Wheels.net
is, these days, about my tai chi tuition here at my home dojo
... and Kyu ... and Shin ... and Do. As further explanation of
those proceeding three words I quote from another major piece
that I am currently working on with Ray; a 100,000+ life story
of Kenshiro Abbey with accompanying historical notes and related
philosophy. It will be some time before I completed assisting
Ray in the editing and formatting this considerable (life long)
work - so, as brief clarification I offer this short extract (between
the lines) below:
A shorter biography of Kenshiro Abbey
has been at taichido.com for a few years already. Links to this
and other relevent pieces is included below.
Kenshiro Abbey
Abbe was greatly concerned about the modern trend towards materialism,
and he perceived Kyushindo as a spiritual alternative to this
and attempted to transmit/propagate his specific theories through
Budo (Japanese Martial Arts).
Specifically:
Kyu: means desire, yearn, sphere or circle, search or
study.
Shin: means the heart, spirit, true inner nature or nexus
point, universal truth or law, to be true to oneself.
Do: means the way or path, sense of a total path. A way
of life, or self discipline.
Furthermore:
This Japanese Kyushin philosophy is derived from three fundamental
precepts, which are:-
1. Bambutsu Ruten: All things existent in the universe
turn in a constant state of flux. All things in the universe
undergo a succession of change.
2. Ritsudo: Motion. Rhythmic and smooth, flowing movement.
3. Chowa: All things act, flow, work in a perfect accord
/ harmony."
Abbe Sensei began working on his theory
as far back as the 1940's. He had a clear vision of the ideas,
based on Universal Laws and principles and consistent with the
Buddhist theory of the Karmic Cycle (The Law of Karma: "what
goes around comes around") - especially as far as its application
to life is concerned - and in respect for all 'things' no matter
how trivial or insignificant these 'things' might at first apparently
be.
So, Kyushindo as a philosophy was
not the pure invention of Abbe Docho however, once he had realized
the real significance of this ancient religious philosophy,
he directly applied and related it to the creation of an entirely
new concept of Budo.
Essentially:
Kenshiro Abbey suggested that: To attain perfection in technique
one must seek to attain to perfection as a human being, and
through study and practice become a 'better' person and become
a useful and positive factor in society. Thus, Kyushindo teaching
is firmly based on moral law and cultivation of human character.
And the bottom line (between the lines)
is:
The teaching strength of Kyushindo discipline lies in understanding
the inner principle behind violence and aggression. In other
words, all violent and aggressive acts are fundamentally immoral.
I now finally conclude this, my section
of this months taichido newsletter by, as promised, pointing
you towards the new articles (a mini sites worth no less!) @
wheels.net; but before you go may I remind you again that I
put them where I did because they are not 'strictly' about Tai
Chi.
Taichido is about a kind of everyday/everyman Tai Chi as practiced
here in the west; with discussion and analyses the indigenous
martial, moral and ethical systems and beliefs of its place
of origin and creation i.e. China.
Wheels.net is about my tai chi tuition here and my home dojo
... and Shin Buddhism (from Japan)
and Kyu (desire, yearn, sphere or circle, search or study) ...
and Do (the way or path, sense of a total path. A way of life,
or self discipline). And now, as a direct consequence of my
reuniting with my Tai Chi Master, Ray Wood 8th Dan Hanshi, it
is also about the Japanese cultural phenomena of "Budo".
I'll leave it to you to find out what other words such as "Bu"
and "Hanshi" mean on any excursion you make into the
links that follow, but I will if I may, again just for surface
clarification, end for now with my own brief comment on the
little word "Do"
Way back in '98 when we decided that we could do with a catchy name
for our website (and abandon the name "Southampton City
Dojo") we just tagged the word "do" on to the
end of taichi - to indicate that it was all about "the
way" ("Do") of Tai Chi. We were quite aware that
"taichido" was a mongrel word ("taichi"-Chinese
culture and language, "Do" "-Japanese culture
and language) and we were equally aware that it thus crossed
boundaries ... ... ... but we did not expect it to cause offense
or elicit the deep analysis of 'experts' who seemed to be saying
"how dare you"! If we were saying anything at all
it was nothing more than "way" is "way",
regardless of language or origin. We didn't mean to be controversial
and we certainly didn't want go to war over a word - so we just
sidestepped these complaints and carried on regardless at taichido.com
... ... ... and I began work on wheelswithinwheels.net.
It has been about 5 years in the making
and old friends of taichido and this its newsletter will be
well aware of the slow and somewhat conceptual development of
wheels.net but it is now, more or less 'all there' ... ... ...
and I best force myself to cease rambling now before I go on
twice as long about how pleased I am with the appearances, ease
of use and 'comprehensive-ness' of all of our various sites,
sister sites and mini sites!
Gary Robinson
A bewildering array of
styles
So
far in the last few newsletters, I have been taking a brief look
at four of the five main styles of tai chi and touched upon how
they came to be. The Chen style came first from the Henan
Province in the 17th century as a form of kung fu that
was softer and more internal in its methods, taking as it did
from the Taoist monasteries and combining within it both health
and combat. A fairly deadly and secretive kung fu, a century and
a half later the only non-Chen-Clan-member to learn this martial
art then took it to Beijing and created
his own style. That man was Yang LuChan, and the style was the
Yang. There is evidence that Yang LuChan
didn’t completely betray his masters, as the Form that
he developed for the Imperial Guard was a softer and less-martial
style that was used more for exercise and fitness rather than
be usable against for example, the Chen villages.
One
of those Imperial Guards in the nineteenth century was Wu Chuan
Yau who took the Yang Form and developed a more subtle style utilising
a narrower performing circle, called the Wu Style. Much more suitable
for the general Chinese population in an era where martial arts
were less necessary for use in anger, it is in the Wu that we start
to see the transition from ‘combat’ to ‘sport’ and in the twentieth
century the Yang Family then paved the way for the splitting
of tai chi into two forms: combat (tai chi chuan) and pure health
& fitness (tai chi), followed by others such as the Wu. The
Sun Style is a much more modern one created and developed from these
during the twentieth Century. All these four have the same origins;
however the fifth – the Lee Form – appears to have evolved separately
alongside the others. First taught to outsiders in the 1930s in
England this form has as its roots
not the Chen influence but a combination of wushu and Taoist health
preserved in the Lee Family for over a thousand years and known
ancestrally by the term Eight Strands of the Brocade.
In
my research delving I found that each of these styles had their
own variations: We know the Yang’s popular Long and Short Forms
(with variations that specify 88, 108 or 132 or more moves), but
there are also variations that combine the Form with spear or with
sword. Then there are variations developed by individual masters
– the most famous being Cheng Man-ch’ing, who’s version myself and
Gary
use as our basis. Plus a Competition Form. Similarly with the Chen
style, there seems to be the Chen Standardised, Chen ‘health’ Standardised
(by which I think we can attribute the health version of the form
as opposed to the chuan), Chen ‘health’ Standardised Sword, Chen
Sabre, Chen Cannon Fist (old Form) and Cannon Fist (new form), Chen
Old Style, Chen New Frame, Chen New Frame (39), and Chen Competition.
Plus variations by masters – Chen Xiao Wang, Chen Zheng Lee, and
so on.
Of
the Wu Form I found Wu, Wu Long, Wu International 54 Competition
and a variation of this that only uses 42 moves, Wu Competition,
Wu (Hao) Long and Short Forms. Sun Style includes
The Sun Standardised Short form, Sun Family Modern Short form, Sun
Traditional Short form, and Sun Competition. For Lee I found Lee
Short and Lee Long.
An
extraordinary array of styles and variations – no wonder we get
emails about the differences! But it doesn’t stop there. I found
further hybrids that demanded my attention. Perhaps the best-known
of these is the 24 Form, also known as the 24 Simplified Form or
the Peking Form. This was created by the Chinese Sports Committee
in 1956 in order to provide a more truncated and simpler Form of
only 24 moves that would be less difficult to learn and quicker
to execute than the complex Yang Long Form from which it took as
its basis. This was to encourage the general Chinese populace to
partake in tai chi as a daily health exercise.
The
42 Competition Form appears to have been created very recently (1989)
and is a combat form for competition that combines movements from
the traditional Yang, Chen, Sun and Wu styles. Again created by
the Chinese Sports Committee in order to standardise the many different
competition forms, it was in the 11th Asian Games of
1990 where this form was used for the tai chi rounds.
One
variation of Cheng Man-ching’s style of Yang Form is known as Huang
Sheng Shyan Form, after its creator of the same name. Huang Sheng-Shyan
was born in 1910 and became a disciple of Cheng Man-Ching in 1947
and from this tradition he developed his own tai chi style. Another
‘newbie’ is the Taoist Tai Chi Society Form developed by Moy Lin-Shin
in Canada in
the 1970s. Moy modified the orthodox Yang style and mixed it with
Lok Hup Ba Fa and other internal martial arts but he also went a
step further and removed all references to martial arts from his
form, creating a ‘pure’ health and meditative method. As far as
he was concerned, the competitive nature of tai chi through the
martial aspects that was present in other tai chi styles excluded
those not physically fit, such as the old or infirm. This is very
interesting, as its philosophy makes tai chi available to everyone.
Another
Form that I found was The Tchoung Style. This was created by Tchoung
Ta-tchen in the twentieth century and is modified from the ‘old
Form’ of Yang – the form that pre-dates changes made by Yang Cheng-fu
in the 1930s. Tchoung style is more symmetrical but appears to be
more complex, it contains 220 moves – an extraordinary amount of
moves for tai chi. Tchoung Ta-tchen was an expert in Yang Form,
Pakua, tai chi sticks, sword and pushing hands in Taiwan
and America.
Just
to top it all off there were styles that I found but ran out of
time researching such as Dong
Yue Combined and the Wudang Forms. A truly bewildering array of
styles, sub-styles, variations, combat forms, health forms and so
on. This reinforces mine and Gary’s belief that there is no ‘right’
or ‘wrong’ style of tai chi, and no ‘true’ style
- or even ‘true’ or ‘authentic’ style of say, Yang Form.
While our roots and influences lie in Cheng Man-ching’s Yang style,
tai chi is whatever you make it, and it will depend upon the influences
of your own instructor that will be the path that you take –the
right path, whichever one it is. Just
as a footnote, I am ‘collecting’ form lists as I find them and compiling
them in the Form lists section of the website. I’ve got a few new
ones to add soon, and if anyone has anything not on this list Iwould
be grateful if they could send it to me!
Much
of the research for this article was simply trawling the internet,
but the main bibliographical references come from Wikipedia.org
– try searching for ‘tai chi form lists’.
Mark Allen
|