home page
characteristics of tai chi
the tai chi netguide
form lists
stances and warming up
tai chi styles
tai chi and martial art
tai chi and health
tai chi philosophy
chi
chi kung
yang part three notes
taoism
buddhism
kyushindo budo
kuan yin
chinese astrology signs
 
tai chi tuition with Gary
find a tai chi teacher near you
taichido's own learning products at taichidoshop
taichido's sister site wheelswithinwheels.net
the pure land Fellowship (buddhism)
the taichido newlsetter
contacts
disclaimer
 
carbon neutral website


subscribe to the free newsletter

Learn Tai Chi
with our CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs & DVDs
jump to taichidoshop.co.uk

 

back to back issues > back issues 2006

 taichido newsletter
Newsletter issue 53 May 2006

Hi there everybody! If only because it has been many months since I was last able to do so, I am going to talk with you in this, my section of this newsletter, in my ordinary everyday voice and pass on to you some plain and simple news; and I must start by saying that this is a relief!

Some time ago, mainly because a lack of real 'news' (we did tai chi last week, we did tai chi this week, we plan to do tai chi next week etc.) we changed the style of this monthly publication and have since used it to preview or promote new article's that went on to published on either the taichido.com or wheelswithinwheels.net websites, and since then around about a dozen or so new pieces have been put online ... one place or another. There have been a many article in half as many months because Mark has written as many as me. Mark continues in that vein this month - but, because of circumstance that I hope to explain as I go along, I won't.

However, rest assured, this does not mean that you will not indirectly get a new article from me this month. You will get one ... but I didn't write it - Ray did! "Who's Ray?" I hear you say. Long term subscribers/readers will know that Ray was the person who taught Mark and I Tai Chi Tai Chi..


Way back in 1975 my tai chi teacher (Ray Wood, 8th Dan Hanshi) registered his martial art instruction system as "KYUTAICHIDO" (KYU-TAICHI-DO). That name then gradually fell into disuse until 1998 - to be then revived in portion only as the domain name/website "TAICHIDO".com.

My rambling story continues:
When we set up the taichido website we drew considerably upon text provided by Ray. He had written a 200+ A4 page book called simply "Tai Chi Chuan". This document had hitherto been published only as home DTP and mainly given away to friends. The majority of the first pieces published at taichido.com were taken from that DTP book.

Most of Ray's articles @taichido.com have since been superseded with rewrites on the same or similar themes - by Mark or me - and now the traces of Ray @taichido.com are faint. In most instances all that remains of the originals is the title or subject matter. This work became necessary because Ray's personal circumstances rendered him as out of contact with us for several years and thus, if it were ever required (and several times it was!) that Mark or I personally verify or check sources we were, throughout that period, unfortunatly unable to do so. So we learnt to stand alone.

I have myself been teaching tai chi since 1996. I met Mark in 1997 just as Ray began to fade from view a little - and by about 1999 he was 'off the screen' completely.
Several rivers of water have gone under this bridge that I metaphorically stand on now and many people have come and gone through the doors of the dojo (one dojo, two locations) that I have run since day one - and I am greatly honored to be able to say that since day one a small group has continued to meet with me here every Thursday night on a weekly basis. Throughout the years of Rays moratorium I daubed this group "the core group".

The Kyu Group
The how and why Ray went away (though by the way it must be said that I do now believe one reasons was to teach me how to stand alone!) and the how or why of how he came back are now inconsequential. Fact is, Ray and I again in close contact and for the last three months he has come here once a month to my home-dojo to present Master Classes in Sticking Hands to the core group that I have now renamed "The Kyu Group".

Aside from this I have been further personally privileged by Ray's provision of many new articles and analyses on a diverse range of martial art or "Budo" subjects. However, as the subject matter of these articles is neither tai chi or sticking hands I felt it more fitting that I should publish them all as a mini site "within" wheelswithinwheels.net - the sister site of taichidocom.

Taichido.com is all about Tai Chi. The ancient Chinese art. Wheels.net is, these days, about my tai chi tuition here at my home dojo ... and Kyu ... and Shin ... and Do. As further explanation of those proceeding three words I quote from another major piece that I am currently working on with Ray; a 100,000+ life story of Kenshiro Abbey with accompanying historical notes and related philosophy. It will be some time before I completed assisting Ray in the editing and formatting this considerable (life long) work - so, as brief clarification I offer this short extract (between the lines) below:

A shorter biography of Kenshiro Abbey has been at taichido.com for a few years already. Links to this and other relevent pieces is included below.


Kenshiro Abbey
Abbe was greatly concerned about the modern trend towards materialism, and he perceived Kyushindo as a spiritual alternative to this and attempted to transmit/propagate his specific theories through Budo (Japanese Martial Arts).


Specifically:
Kyu: means desire, yearn, sphere or circle, search or study.
Shin: means the heart, spirit, true inner nature or nexus point, universal truth or law, to be true to oneself.
Do: means the way or path, sense of a total path. A way of life, or self discipline.

Furthermore:
This Japanese Kyushin philosophy is derived from three fundamental precepts, which are:-
1. Bambutsu Ruten: All things existent in the universe turn in a constant state of flux. All things in the universe undergo a succession of change.
2. Ritsudo: Motion. Rhythmic and smooth, flowing movement.
3. Chowa: All things act, flow, work in a perfect accord / harmony."

Abbe Sensei began working on his theory as far back as the 1940's. He had a clear vision of the ideas, based on Universal Laws and principles and consistent with the Buddhist theory of the Karmic Cycle (The Law of Karma: "what goes around comes around") - especially as far as its application to life is concerned - and in respect for all 'things' no matter how trivial or insignificant these 'things' might at first apparently be.

So, Kyushindo as a philosophy was not the pure invention of Abbe Docho however, once he had realized the real significance of this ancient religious philosophy, he directly applied and related it to the creation of an entirely new concept of Budo.

Essentially:
Kenshiro Abbey suggested that: To attain perfection in technique one must seek to attain to perfection as a human being, and through study and practice become a 'better' person and become a useful and positive factor in society. Thus, Kyushindo teaching is firmly based on moral law and cultivation of human character.

And the bottom line (between the lines) is:
The teaching strength of Kyushindo discipline lies in understanding the inner principle behind violence and aggression. In other words, all violent and aggressive acts are fundamentally immoral.


I now finally conclude this, my section of this months taichido newsletter by, as promised, pointing you towards the new articles (a mini sites worth no less!) @ wheels.net; but before you go may I remind you again that I put them where I did because they are not 'strictly' about Tai Chi.
Taichido is about a kind of everyday/everyman Tai Chi as practiced here in the west; with discussion and analyses the indigenous martial, moral and ethical systems and beliefs of its place of origin and creation i.e. China.
Wheels.net is about my tai chi tuition here and my home dojo ... and Shin Buddhism (from Japan) and Kyu (desire, yearn, sphere or circle, search or study) ... and Do (the way or path, sense of a total path. A way of life, or self discipline). And now, as a direct consequence of my reuniting with my Tai Chi Master, Ray Wood 8th Dan Hanshi, it is also about the Japanese cultural phenomena of "Budo". I'll leave it to you to find out what other words such as "Bu" and "Hanshi" mean on any excursion you make into the links that follow, but I will if I may, again just for surface clarification, end for now with my own brief comment on the little word "Do"

Way back in '98 when we decided that we could do with a catchy name for our website (and abandon the name "Southampton City Dojo") we just tagged the word "do" on to the end of taichi - to indicate that it was all about "the way" ("Do") of Tai Chi. We were quite aware that "taichido" was a mongrel word ("taichi"-Chinese culture and language, "Do" "-Japanese culture and language) and we were equally aware that it thus crossed boundaries ... ... ... but we did not expect it to cause offense or elicit the deep analysis of 'experts' who seemed to be saying "how dare you"! If we were saying anything at all it was nothing more than "way" is "way", regardless of language or origin. We didn't mean to be controversial and we certainly didn't want go to war over a word - so we just sidestepped these complaints and carried on regardless at taichido.com ... ... ... and I began work on wheelswithinwheels.net.

It has been about 5 years in the making and old friends of taichido and this its newsletter will be well aware of the slow and somewhat conceptual development of wheels.net but it is now, more or less 'all there' ... ... ... and I best force myself to cease rambling now before I go on twice as long about how pleased I am with the appearances, ease of use and 'comprehensive-ness' of all of our various sites, sister sites and mini sites!

Gary Robinson


A bewildering array of styles
So far in the last few newsletters, I have been taking a brief look at four of the five main styles of tai chi and touched upon how they came to be.  The Chen style came first from the Henan Province in the 17th century as a form of kung fu that was softer and more internal in its methods, taking as it did from the Taoist monasteries and combining within it both health and combat. A fairly deadly and secretive kung fu, a century and a half later the only non-Chen-Clan-member to learn this martial art then took it to Beijing and created his own style. That man was Yang LuChan, and the style was the Yang. There is evidence that Yang LuChan  didn’t completely betray his masters, as the Form that he developed for the Imperial Guard was a softer and less-martial style that was used more for exercise and fitness rather than be usable against for example, the Chen villages.

One of those Imperial Guards in the nineteenth century was Wu Chuan Yau who took the Yang Form and developed a more subtle style utilising a narrower performing circle, called the Wu Style. Much more suitable for the general Chinese population in an era where martial arts were less necessary for use in anger, it is in the Wu that we start to see the transition from ‘combat’ to ‘sport’ and in the twentieth century the Yang Family then paved the way for the splitting of tai chi into two forms: combat (tai chi chuan) and pure health & fitness (tai chi), followed by others such as the Wu. The Sun Style is a much more modern one created and developed from these during the twentieth Century. All these four have the same origins; however the fifth – the Lee Form – appears to have evolved separately alongside the others. First taught to outsiders in the 1930s in England this form has as its roots not the Chen influence but a combination of wushu and Taoist health preserved in the Lee Family for over a thousand years and  known ancestrally by the term Eight Strands of the Brocade.

In my research delving I found that each of these styles had their own variations: We know the Yang’s popular Long and Short Forms (with variations that specify 88, 108 or 132 or more moves), but there are also variations that combine the Form with spear or with sword. Then there are variations developed by individual masters – the most famous being Cheng Man-ch’ing, who’s version myself and Gary use as our basis. Plus a Competition Form. Similarly with the Chen style, there seems to be the Chen Standardised, Chen ‘health’ Standardised (by which I think we can attribute the health version of the form as opposed to the chuan), Chen ‘health’ Standardised Sword, Chen Sabre, Chen Cannon Fist (old Form) and Cannon Fist (new form), Chen Old Style, Chen New Frame, Chen New Frame (39), and Chen Competition. Plus variations by masters – Chen Xiao Wang, Chen Zheng Lee, and so on.

Of the Wu Form I found Wu, Wu Long, Wu International 54 Competition and a variation of this that only uses 42 moves, Wu Competition, Wu  (Hao) Long and Short Forms. Sun Style includes The Sun Standardised Short form, Sun Family Modern Short form, Sun Traditional Short form, and Sun Competition. For Lee I found Lee Short and Lee Long.

An extraordinary array of styles and variations – no wonder we get emails about the differences! But it doesn’t stop there. I found further hybrids that demanded my attention. Perhaps the best-known of these is the 24 Form, also known as the 24 Simplified Form or the Peking Form. This was created by the Chinese Sports Committee in 1956 in order to provide a more truncated and simpler Form of only 24 moves that would be less difficult to learn and quicker to execute than the complex Yang Long Form from which it took as its basis. This was to encourage the general Chinese populace to partake in tai chi as a daily health exercise.

The 42 Competition Form appears to have been created very recently (1989) and is a combat form for competition that combines movements from the traditional Yang, Chen, Sun and Wu styles. Again created by the Chinese Sports Committee in order to standardise the many different competition forms, it was in the 11th Asian Games of 1990 where this form was used for the tai chi rounds.

One variation of Cheng Man-ching’s style of Yang Form is known as Huang Sheng Shyan Form, after its creator of the same name. Huang Sheng-Shyan was born in 1910 and became a disciple of Cheng Man-Ching in 1947 and from this tradition he developed his own tai chi style. Another ‘newbie’ is the Taoist Tai Chi Society Form developed by Moy Lin-Shin in Canada in the 1970s. Moy modified the orthodox Yang style and mixed it with Lok Hup Ba Fa and other internal martial arts but he also went a step further and removed all references to martial arts from his form, creating a ‘pure’ health and meditative method. As far as he was concerned, the competitive nature of tai chi through the martial aspects that was present in other tai chi styles excluded those not physically fit, such as the old or infirm. This is very interesting, as its philosophy makes tai chi available to everyone.

Another Form that I found was The Tchoung Style. This was created by Tchoung Ta-tchen in the twentieth century and is modified from the ‘old Form’ of Yang – the form that pre-dates changes made by Yang Cheng-fu in the 1930s. Tchoung style is more symmetrical but appears to be more complex, it contains 220 moves – an extraordinary amount of moves for tai chi. Tchoung Ta-tchen was an expert in Yang Form, Pakua, tai chi sticks, sword and pushing hands in Taiwan and America.

Just to top it all off there were styles that I found but ran out of time researching such as  Dong Yue Combined and the Wudang Forms. A truly bewildering array of styles, sub-styles, variations, combat forms, health forms and so on. This reinforces mine and Gary’s belief that there is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ style of tai chi, and no ‘true’ style  - or even ‘true’ or ‘authentic’ style of say, Yang Form. While our roots and influences lie in Cheng Man-ching’s Yang style, tai chi is whatever you make it, and it will depend upon the influences of your own instructor  that will be the path that you take –the right path, whichever one it is. Just as a footnote, I am ‘collecting’ form lists as I find them and compiling them in the Form lists section of the website. I’ve got a few new ones to add soon, and if anyone has anything not on this list Iwould be grateful if they could send it to me!

Much of the research for this article was simply trawling the internet, but the main bibliographical references come from Wikipedia.org – try searching for ‘tai chi form lists’.

Mark Allen


 Regular references:
Newsletter Back Issues
[http://www.soton.ac.uk/%7Emaa1/chi/others/backissues.htm]
NetGuide
[http://www.soton.ac.uk/~maa1/chi/menunetguide.ht]
interactive learning media packages
[http://www.wheelswithinwheels.net/taichidoshop/taichidoshop.htm]


. © www.taichido.com 2000-2008. No reproduction or republishing of any material on this website without prior consent.